Are we dividing and destroying the 9-11 movement?

Or are we cleaning our house of trash?

Fintan Dunne and Daryl Smith are two of many people who accuse some of the 9-11 activists of lying:
 

Fintan Dunne has a list of web sites that he calls "The CIA Fakes". 

 

Daryl Smith recently mentioned that Karl Schwarz appears to be a grifter, and that Tom Flocco seems to be a disinformation agent.

Are these accusations dividing and weakening the 9-11 truth movement? Or are they making the 9-11 movement more effective? How do we determine whose accusations are helping us, and whose are hurting us?
 
 

It is true that when members of a group fight among themselves, they become less effective.

However, is also true that a group must clean itself of incompetent leaders and criminals.

Therefore, we need to distinguish between the disruptive fighting that can weaken a group, and the beneficial fighting that cleanses an organization of its incompetence and criminal activity.

If the fighting involves nothing more than insults, it is usually disruptive. Insults are sometimes useful, however, because they can act like a slap in the face to force a person to look at an issue differently.

If the fighting involves serious analyses of behavior, by comparison, it is usually helpful because it can identify the incompetent or corrupt leaders. Not surprisingly, crummy leaders will try to suppress analyses of themselves.
 
 

Examples of insults

A worthless insult is calling somebody an anti-American, anti-semite, fascist, liberal wacko commie, or right wing extremist.

Nobody learns anything when people make the sort of accusations. These type of insults should be suppressed. Some people will justify these insults as "freedom of speech", but I would not refer to this as "speech". Rather, I would say it is equivalent to the growling of a dog. These are attempt to manipulate emotions.
 

An insult that can have value is Smith's remark about the Flocco Flambé. (you can find it at the bottom of the main page for iamthewitness.com)

The Flocco Flambé does not belong in a serious scientific journal, but Smith is running a radio show.

Furthermore, the purpose of the Flocco Flambé joke was not to hurt Tom Flocco. Rather, it was to slap people in the face and make them take a closer look at what Flocco is saying.
 

Karl Schwarz claims to be President and Chief Executive Officer of Patmos Nanotechnologies, LLC. Here is their web site

Daryl Smith is one of many people who tried to figure out what this company is, and whether Schwarz is honest about his other claims.

When Smith announces on the radio that the Patmos company appears to be a sham, and that Schwarz appears to be deceiving us about his wealth, Smith he is not insulting Schwarz. Rather, he is providing us with his analysis of the evidence he uncovered with his limited resources.
 

The Flocco Flambé is an insult, but when Smith complains that Tom Flocco appears to be a disinformation agent, he is not insulting Flocco or fighting with him. Rather, he is providing us with his analysis of Flocco's documents at his web site.

 

 
 
 

By comparison, Fintan Dunne has a list of "CIA Fakes", but not much of an analysis to support the accusations. It appears to me that Dunne is one of the disinformation agents who is trying to confuse people.

If I am correct that Dunne is an agent, then we must consider all of his associates to be agents until they are proven innocent. After all, why would a person struggle to cover up a phenomenal crime unless he is somehow involved with the criminals behind the crime?

Therefore, when you identify an agent, you just identified one member of the criminal network, so you should check out all of his associates to locate more members.
 
 

I don't worry about disrupting the 9/11 movement because I don't see any 9-11 movement. Instead, I see two categories of 9-11 activists:

 
1) Individual citizens who work on their own

There are thousands of citizens who operate independently of one another. These people spread information about 9-11 and other crimes to their friends and relatives.

There is no central authority giving orders to these people; no central authority to organize their activities. Each of these people does whatever he pleases.

I refer to these people as an invisible army because most of them are ordinary citizens, and we will never know their names. Most of them may affect only a few other people, but there are thousands of them, and they are scattered around the world. They are having a significant effect.

As an example of how effective they are, consider my book and video. The major bookstores, book reviewers, and media companies have been completely ignoring my book and video. My information is spreading around the world because of these ordinary citizens.
 

2) Organizations

Example are 911truth.org, MoveOn.org, and Veterans for Peace. The members of these groups work together under the guidance of leaders.

Some of these groups are very large, such as the MoveOn organization, which claims to have more than a million members.

Have you ever wondered what you would do if you were the leader of any of these groups?

If I was their leader, I would have provided their members with copies of my book and video. I would have also provided them with books, videos, and web sites about other crimes, such as the attack on the USS Liberty and the Kennedy assassination.

Certainly some members would disagree with my particular positions on these crimes, but the point I am trying to make is that I would provide the information to them, and I would push them into learning about and discussing these issues.

Compare what you or I would do to what the actual leaders of those organizations have been doing. The members of MoveOn, for example, expose their members to the type of information we can find on CBS or NBC television. The Veterans For Peace expose their members to the type of simplistic information we find on the CNN headline news. The Green Party would provide its members with more political information by telling them to read the Doonesbury comic strip each day.

Obviously, the leaders of these groups are incredibly incompetent, or members of the criminal network.

If an organization does not provide any benefit to its members or society, what is the point of joining it?

We must stop making excuses for our leaders. We are not dividing our nation when we complain about these people. Rather, we are cleaning our house of worthless and corrupt management.

When Daryl Smith complains about Tom Flocco, he is not complaining about Flocco's personal life, personality, or relationships with other people. Rather, Smith is pointing out that much of the material in Flocco's documents is nonsense.

By comparison, when Smith complains about Karl Schwarz, he complains about his morality, in addition to complaining about his opinions.

When is it acceptable to complain about a person's life and personality?

I would say that when somebody is trying to be a leader, his personality and life become important. Schwarz wants to be president of United States in 2008. He wants to pass judgment on how we live, how our economy will operate, and which nation deserves a bombing. I say we are justified to investigage Schwarz in order to determine what type of a mind and personality he has. If Schwarz doesn't like the intense scrutiny, then he should not try to get control of our lives.

If our ancestors had set higher standards for their leaders, and if they had looked more closer at their political candidates, our nation would be in better shape today.
 
 

When I complain about the leadership in the 9-11 movement, the peace movement, the labor unions, the school system, the corporations, and our government, I hear endless excuses.

Both the Republicans and the Democrats have dozens of excuses for their crummy leaders; the members of the MoveOn organization have excuses for their incompetent leadership; and the members of the Veterans For Peace have excuses for their crummy leadership.

We need more people like Daryl Smith to stand up to these crummy and corrupt leaders.

We are not dividing the nation when we stand up to our leaders. Rather, we are cleaning our house of incompetence and corruption. We are exposing the crummy leaders and criminals.

For for information on deception:

If you know the names Lisa Pease, Jenna Orkin, you might like this:
www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_PestControl.htm

Why they are so desperate to shift blame to Arabs:
www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_WTC_exposed.html
 

About Crypto Zionists:
www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_CryptoZionists.htm