Apollo moon landing hoax!
20 June 2007
Was it an accident? Did they realize what they were doing? Or are some NASA employees getting tired of supporting the lies?
|The image above is at the NASA site, Astronomy Picture of the Day,
for tomorrow, 21 June 2007:
It is a drawing of what the Earth's sky would look like during the daytime if the atmosphere did not scatter sunlight.
NASA admits that even with the sun shining, the stars would be visible.
|Eric Hufschmid's Science Challenge asked if Apollo astronauts
would be able to see stars while they were on the moon:
And would astronauts see stars as they traveled to and from the moon? Would astronauts in the space shuttle be able to see stars?
NASA has been claiming for decades that it is nearly impossible for astronauts to see stars, but now the Astronomy Picture of the Day admits that without an atmosphere, we would see stars even when the sun was shining.
Have you seen the Apollo press conference when Neil Armstrong and Mike
Collins said they didn't see stars? The video is on this page:
What is going on?
The man who drew the picture is Jerry Lodriguss. He is a professional
photographer, and his website is full of photographs of the universe:
In Hufschmid's more detailed PDF file about the Apollo moon landing
hoax, he mentioned this particular man on page 15:
Hufschmid sent him an e-mail a couple years ago to "Get a clue!" Has Jerry Lodriguss finally figured out that the Apollo moon landing was a hoax? Or has he known it was a hoax for many years?
Why would NASA put this on their website and admit that stars would be seen during daytime when there is no atmosphere to scatter the sunlight?
Is it possible that people are starting to rebel against the corruption? Is it possible that people are tired of maintaining the Apollo moon landing hoax? Are American men finally behaving like men rather than frightened children?
Or didn't NASA realize what they were doing when they put this page
on their site? Will this particular page be deleted as soon as they realize
what they just did? Will they frantically struggle to devise a flimsy excuse
to explain this page?
NASA to crash a probe into moon in 2008
They call it LCROSS. NASA wants to analyze the moon to
see if there is water on it. Why don't
they just analyze the hundreds of kilograms
that they claim the Apollo astronauts brought back from the moon? NASA's
excuse is that the astronauts only took samples near the surface! KQED
has a video describing the LCROSS program:
Colaprete is the LCROSS "Principal Investigator". Does he and other people
at NASA actually believe that they sent people to the moon? Or do they
all realize that NASA is just a big hoax?
What has NASA done in their decades of existence besides lie to us and
waste our money? Are the two Mars rovers really on Mars? Or are they in
an Australian desert?
Who wants to become an astronaut?
A lot of people might like to be an astronaut, but it requires keeping secret about NASA's many crimes. For example, have you noticed that none of the astronauts in the space station ever mention what the stars look like? Or what Mars looks like?
How about this report that claims the son of astronaut Virgil Grissom
accuses NASA of murdering his father:
NASA cannot let an honest person become an astronaut. The only people they allow to be astronauts are people with psychotic obsessions to become astronauts. These mentally ill people will keep the secrets because they desperately want to be an astronaut.
In other words, the astronauts are lunatics. This is why they exhibit so much psychotic behavior.