Home

 
A response
to the WingTV complaints

The WingTV article is:
http://www.wingtv.net/thorn2006/darylsmith.html
 

The WingTV article is similar to that from Karl Schwarz, in that they select words to incite anger, they make some outright lies, and they make idiotic statements. One of the most obvious examples:
 
 

... he told Lisa Guliani that he was sitting with a loaded shotgun across his lap because he thought “people who wanted to get him” were plotting his murder. 

I don't own a shotgun; perhaps I mentioned that I own a rifle. But even if I owned a shotgun, what is their point?

WingTV brings up this issue up in order to imply that I am paranoid or insane. However, a lot of people have guns for protection, especially when they are fighting criminal networks. Is this your idea of serious journalism?

This harkens back to the hit piece that that Karl Schwarz wrote about me in which "facts" are fabricated or distorted, and statements are chosen to create incite anger.
 
 

Next, notice the word "Jews" in this remark:
 

So when the subject of Alex Jones came up during our January 6, 2006 phone conversation, here is exactly what Daryl Smith said of Alex Jones: “His handlers are the Jews.”

First of all, considering that they were inaccurate about my rifle, how can we be sure they are accurate about this remark?

Second, that is not terminology that I use. Please listen to my radio broadcasts and you will see that I repeatedly hammer the point that we cannot lump people together by race, religion, or nationality.

I frequently stress the concept that not all Italians are responsible for the crimes of the Italian Mafia; not all Republicans are responsible for the crimes of the Bush administration; and not all Jews are responsible for the crimes by Zionists.

In fact, the reason I terminated my relationship with John Kaminski was because he was making these broad brush statements about "Jews".

WingTV is doing exactly what I condemned Kaminski for doing. Specifically, both WingTV and Kaminski are using the word "Jews" in an attempt to incite anger.
 
 
 
 

Smith believes Kaminski is being PAID to make racist remarks, somewhere in the vicinity of $3000-$5000 per month! Is this what Smith meant when he stated that John Kaminski is “a man who lives on donations?” We’d like to know more about how Daryl defines “donations,” how he arrived at this figure, and where he thinks the source of this funding comes from.

Kaminski admits that he depends on donations for a living. I don't know exactly how much money he gets, or who gives it to him.

The issue of Kaminski is especially interesting because WingTV publishes at least one of his books, and sends him royalties. Why doesn't WingTV mention this relevant fact? Isn't this what we call a "conflict of interest"?

Why is WingTV demanding that I explain Kaminski's finances? It is WingTV that has a working relationship with him, not me. 
Therefore, WingTV knows more about Kaminski's finances than I do because they know exactly how much money they give him.

I wonder if WingTV is biased in Kaminski's favor, and if that bias is one of the reasons they are writing such an angry article about me.

I am also wondering if Kaminski and/or Scott Makufka of WingTV are Jewish, and/or if they are secretly working with the Zionists in order to encourage fights among 9-11 investigators.

I also wonder if their frequent use of the word "Jews" is an attempt to perpetuate the illusion that those of us who stand up to the Zionists are anti-Semitic.
 
 
 
 
 

Smith also informed us that Mike Rivero, editor of What Really Happened, has refused to appear on Jack Blood’s show any longer. This news is significant because Rivero used to make an appearance every month on Blood’s show; but now, according to Daryl Smith, he “dumped Blood.” Smith didn’t provide any further details, 

If I remember correctly, I was on the phone with Eric Hufschmid one day. Eric was browsing the Internet as we were talking, and one of the sites he went to during the conversation was whatreallyhappened. He noticed that Jack blood was no longer listed along the top, and he mentioned it to me, and both of us wondered why. 

If WingTV wants to know why Rivero is no longer doing regular interviews with Jack Blood, they should ask Rivero, not me.

Whether I said that Rivero "dumped" Blood, or whether he "dropped" Blood, or whether he "spilled" Blood, what difference does it make?

For the love of George Bush, it was a private, social conversation of no importance! I was not talking to WingTV to work out the details for a business deal or to write an article about Rivero, it was just to say hello and chat.

This brings me to another important point. Every adult knows the difference between socializing and serious business. So why is WingTV taking a meaningless, private phone conversation, and exaggerating it?

I think everybody should consider their article to be a warning that they better be careful speaking to WingTV. I wonder if WingTV is deliberately looking for reasons to start fights.
 
 
 
 

He also told us – very maniacally, we might add – “I’m the Black Mamba. If I bite you, you’re dead!”

First of all, considering that they were inaccurate about my rifle, how can we be sure they are accurate about my Black Mamba remark?

Second, whether I made a remark "very maniacally" or "in a humorous manner" is a personal opinion, not a fact.
 
 
 

From our perspective, this guy either has serious delusions of grandeur, or else he’s halfway off his rocker.

First of all, I could accuse WingTV — and practically everybody else on the planet — of having delusions of grandeur, and of being halfway off their rockers. These are childish insults, not serious, justifiable complaints.

Second, since WingTV considers it acceptable to publicly broadcast their perspective of me, they would not mind if I publicly broadcast my perspective of them. So here goes: my perspective of WingTV is that they are bitter and angry.
 
 
 

Smith also wrote an expose on Rense which ties him (via his stepmother) to the Zionist media cabal

Read my article more carefully. I do not tie Rense to the Zionist network because of his stepmother. Rather, I wonder about Rense  because of his choice of columnists, the articles he posts on his site, and the people and information he ignores.

It was only recently that one of my radio listeners told me that Rense's stepmother was involved with the Sy Newhouse media network. I am pointing out that his stepmother is a possible connection to the groups that dominates our media.
 
 
 
 

Could this be why Daryl Smith referred (during his January 20, 2006 broadcast) to Jeff Rense’s website as a “strawman’s writer’s guild?” 

The Strawman Writers Guild refers to people who use a particular type of deception to cover up 9-11, the Zionist connection, and other issues.

That article about the Strawman Writers Guild is not specific to Rense. Please read the article more carefully.
The Strawman Writers Guild
 
 
 
 

Smith further added that Kaminski has graduated into becoming a “David Duke” and that he was “no different than David Duke.”

A few days after I posted my complaints about Kaminski, I updated it because I decided I may have been a bit harsh. Not incorrect; merely harsh. The David Duke remark was removed at that time. Please read the article more carefully:
What are Handlers?
 
 
 
 

Once again, Daryl Smith’s contradictory nature shows itself when he wrote the following words about filmmaker Dylan Avery: “There are also rumors that Dylan Avery, when he is not intoxicated on alcohol, is on some other drug, usually marijuana.” Now mind you, the only problem is, as Smith admits, the above conjecture is based solely on rumor – not fact.

First of all, the issue of Dylan Avery's drug use is significant when you consider that people with problems are exploited by the criminal network. Kay Griggs explains how the criminal network looks for emotionally disturbed people in the military, and then they promote the ones they can control.

I think one of the lessons we should learn from Kay Griggs is that we should watch out for criminal networks promoting people with problems.

Second, Dylan Avery is being promoted by a lot of extremely suspicious people in this 9/11 truth movement. This is an indication that the criminal network is using him. It does not prove that he is being used, but we would be fools if we did not look into the possibility. 

It is possible that the reason so many people are promoting Dylan Avery is that he is not talking about Zionism, the attack on the USS Liberty, the World Wars, The Rothschilds, the Federal Reserve system, Benjamin Freedman, or other very important issues. We should even consider the possibility that Avery is part of the criminal network.

WingTV complained that Dylan Avery's drug use is based on rumor, not fact. Well, I did not want to say this because I did not want to hurt Dylan Avery, but it is a fact that he has a drug problem. For example, Eric Hufschmid personally knows at least three people — people he has spent time with in person, not simply people he exchanged e-mail with — and they all made remarks about Avery's unbelievable level of drug use — without Hufschmid asking for information about Avery!

Please read why his drug problem may be very important:
What are Handlers?

Let me also explain something. If you smoke a little marijuana in your home at night, nobody will know. But when you are using drugs every day, all day, lots of people are going to notice. And lots of people will be talking behind your back about it.
 
 
 
 

Why won’t Daryl Smith speak publicly on his show regarding his suspicions and past investigation of John Stadtmiller and, according to Smith, RBN’s supposed ties to a shadowy insurance company? Smith even tracked his phone records to see if the company in question was a front for RBN. The proof is in the pudding, Daryl, so lay it on the line if you have something.

Actually, I am sure I did discuss on one of my radio shows about how I got a phone call from a phone company asking me why there were so many calls to my house. They explained to me that an enormous phone bill — about $20,000 — had not been paid. They were contacting me to figure out who is responsible for the payment.

After I made a few phone calls, all I could figure out is that some strange company was supposed to be pay the phone bills for RBN, but they were late on some payments.

Why doesn't WingTV investigate RBN? They are friends with John Stadtmiller, not me. Why are they wasting their time asking me about RBN?
 
 

Enough of this, already!



This brings me to my final point. Rather than argue any longer with WingTV, why doesn't WingTV put their talents to good use by investigating the criminal network?

WingTV investigated me, but found nothing. Now they should prove to us that they are not part of the criminal network by investigating the truly suspicious people.

We are certain of our position that world Zionism is in control of our planet, and that anyone who denies this reality has either:

1) not looked at the facts.

2) is fearful of retribution from that group.

3) is working for the Zionists, although they that may not be fully cognizant of that fact.


If WingTV continues to bring up absurd accusations against people who are trying to expose corruption in this world, it is merely an indication that WingTV is indeed part of the criminal network.
 

I am saddened to think that so many people consider the WingTV article worth discussing.

However, I suppose I should have expected people to be easily deceived. After all, lots of people believe Pat Robertson is worth listening to, and many believe George Bush is worth dying for. Millions of others are clinging to the official story about 9/11, also.