 German Patriot Defence Lawyer Sylvia Stolz was sentenced to 3 and-a-half
years in prison and disbarred for 5 years.
Below Sylvia's comments to the court.
She says the Court is perverting and repressing the truth with the cudgel of
"Holocaust," making a mockery of justice. Her trial has made clear the
criminal absurdity of prosecuting "Holocaust Denial." How can one deny
something that never existed? She says these entire proceedings began as a
show trial in a kangaroo court and never progressed beyond that point. The
main proceedings were projected with smoke and mirrors and the official
fairy tale of "Holocaust" was enforced by undisguised force. She observes
that the political intent of the Court is the ultimate eradication of the
German Nation and its replacement by a mongrelized and deculturated
population of mindless consumers.
Sylvia says she is confident that she has succeeded in exposing this Court
to the whole world as an agent that is hostile to the German Nation. By
openly and flagrantly violating the law, this Court flees before the truth.
Incessantly, like turning a prayer wheel, it has rejected her every
evidentiary motion with the cynical pretext of "abuse of courtprocedure." ..... She has hope and faith that the German Nation will someday
bring this treacherous Court to justice.
Sylvia describes how the Defense was forced to accept the contents of the
indictment, and this caused the Court's desired verdict to be the inevitable
consequence. In the absence of material evidence, the Court relied on its
infantile rulings that "Abuse of Procedure = Criminal Act." Thanks to this
judicial sleight of hand, there was no assumption of innocence and the Court
did not have to prove guilt.
Sylvia asks: to what is Grossmann referring when he mentions "domestic and
foreign" court verdicts? Could he be referring to the Nuremberg show trials?
The Allied Military Tribunal was nothing but a postwar Talmudic Inquisition
conducted by Germany's enemies. It featured witnesses with "built-in
credibility" and Jewish testimony that could never be questioned or
authenticated.
She asks: what would people like Grossmann do without the official
obligatory fairy tale of "Holocaust?" Her trial has again demonstrated that
world political powers are players in the "Holocaust" game (or "Holocaust
Industry" as Prof. Norman Finkelstein calls it, he should know, since both
of his parents were interned at Auschwitz during the War.) This explains why
objective historical research is still suppressed, sixty-three years after
the end of the War. As an example of ongoing intellectual repression in
Germany Sylvia refers to the "Hermann Case" in which a popular commentator
was fired for referring to such positive aspects of National Socialism as
its family policy and the construction of Autobahns.
Sylvia demonstrates that the Court's procedural system is very, very simple.
It consists of disallowing all evidentiary motions as "abuse of Court
procedure," which is a criminal act. She says that the District Attorney's
closing tirade was beneath all legal criticism, nothing but purest slander
and abuse.....Then Sylvia shows how powerful interests profit greatly by
inculcating a negative self-image into German society, with their incessant
propaganda and brainwashing. If Germans were as evil as Grossmann depicts
them, they would long ago have skinned him alive.
She points out that under the present Talmudic Inquisition, anyone who calls
attention to the destructive nature of Judaism can be punished. Glenz tells
the Court Reporter to write that remark down as well. Sylvia observes that
today, no one is allowed to say anything the least bit derogatory about
Jews, and yet the necessary first step toward changing and improving
conditions in Germany is recognizing the cause of our malaise. She says that
Horst Mahler's writings provide the proof for this, and she will stand by
this assertion. Glenz orders the Reporter: "Put that in too!"
Sylvia continues and remarks that Germany now stands under the yoke of world
Judaism. Glenz threatens: "We are going to cut off your final address if..."
But Sylvia ignores him and says that following World War II, the real
criminals took over the world. Glenz growls "I'm warning you!" but Sylvia again urges the public to consider the causes of Germany's plight and
continue gathering and considering the material evidence. She tells the
Court that National Socialism is not dead, regardless of how much Grossmann
and his ilk wish it were dead. She says that National Socialism represents
what is good and enduring in the German spirit. Idealism and patriotism are
rigidly suppressed at this time but they cannot be suppressed forever.
Turning toward Grossmann and the Court, she asks:
"Is he German? Or is he
perhaps related to that Moshe Grossmann who for four years following the end
of World War II continued torturing and murdering German slaves in the East,
as the Jewish author John Sack reports in his book An Eye for an Eye?"
Then
she turns to the Bench and asks:
"What about you — are you Germans?"
"German" stands for honor and steadfastness! Think of Deutsche Treue! Nobody
can call what is going on in this court as "honorable." In this court, the
only "justice" is inspired by the Talmud!"
Sylvia expresses her faith that history will take its inevitable course and
"the truth will win out." She says that since the trial began she has been
prepared for her preordained conviction — she told them at the beginning
that she knew her verdict was handed down, even before her indictment. To
the Bench she says
"And you, my high-and-mighty judges, will never again
experience inner peace... Your depiction of National Socialism as a criminal
system will see to that. You are willing accomplices to the brainwashing and
degradation of the German people.... Adolf Hitler accurately recognized the
Jewish problem, the malevolent power of the Jews in certain respects... Yes,
I share the values of National Socialism!"
Sylvia replies,
"If my actions bring a little more light into this dark hour
for Germany, then I will gladly go to prison! It does not bother me that
I am officially ridiculed and insulted by this despicable court and
atrocious government... My high and mighty judges, you are convicting yourselves, not me."
Source: http://twincities.indymedia.org/newswire/display/32751/index.php |
